3 Comments

It was not long after Saddam Hussein gave up his WMD that the US & her coalition of sycophants invaded. I contended at the time that, despite the fact that the US+ invaded on the pretext that Iraq had deployable WMD, they would not actually have done so had they really been risking a hundred thousand dead troops by WMD. They invaded Iraq because the knew it did NOT have WMD. That was & still is my contention.

A decade or so later the same thing happened in Syria. Syria gave up her WMD to international inspection, & not long afterwards western propagandists performed chemical weapons attacks, or possibly faked them, to pin the offences on Assad.

So I find this pretty interesting... "world powers amassed considerable stockpiles of chemical arms, which they agreed to eliminate in 1997, with 192 states supporting the initiative. For instance, Russia completed the full destruction of the 39,967 metric tons of its chemical weapons in September 2017."

Because within eight months of the completion of Russia destroying her chemical/biological stockpile, she was falsely accused to deploying Novichok in Salisbury, Wiltshire, which happened in May, 2018.

Something of a pattern appears to be emerging here...

Expand full comment
founding

Thank you for the interesting back story. It was a treat to read. I'm Canadian and a victim of years of propaganda, lol. Aaron Matte has done some amazing work around this.

Thank you for all that you do. You are amazing. God bless.

Expand full comment

Thank you.

And - from a different wotld, just in:

Ep. 66 – SR in Russia -- OUTSTANDING

https://rumble.com/v2luly8-scott-ritter-extra-ep.-66-ask-the-inspector-live-from-irkutsk.html

Expand full comment