Brilliant interview. Optimistic? not yet....they never run out of tricks & the public are still mind controlled by "education" & "The narrative" & other. The internet is or has been the greatest revolution ever, we can now hear views/facts from extremely knowledgeable & expert folks all over the world instantly. This can also expose Official & Corporate lies, fraud, misinformation etc forcing wrongdoers to change their tactics. But they always do,...they just sweep one massively profitable war failure/racket under the rug & start another war/scam/distraction. They know internet exposing rackets is a death blow to them so now increasingly in recent years they are greatly ramping up internet censorship using armies of massively funded Govt & corporate"misinformation police". Currently in USA they are trying to introduce fines (up to $1 Mil) & Gaol (up to 20yrs) for folks communicating "misinformation" or "Harmful" info. In my view most people in the west are still constantly hoodwinked by media lies & "comfortable" so the ancient trick of "Bread & Circuses" still works like a charm. Other tools they constantly use are fear, distraction and division. Yes Alex, they are still extremely dangerous & more & more vulnerable....AND they could still push us into a hot war with Russia ….& where that will lead too….& you can bet the house, if that would cause the deaths of 4 Billion people they would not care in the slightest. Or anymore than they did for the pos 2 Mill deaths caused in Iraq & ….. It's a battle for hearts & minds, VB & Alex you are doing great, great work, thankyou! …We all need to try & keep spreading knowledge & discussion as much as pos ...word of mouth & sharing info is great (& they hate it!), just do it & keep doing it everybody, it works!
"BRICS and the emergence of a better world order that values the sovereignty of nations." No, so sorry, he is deluded and so are those that believe that.
All of the BRICS nations are firmly onboard the WEF’s Fourth Industrial Revolution and the UN’s Agenda 2030—notably its SDGs.
You're wrong Jack; the real struggle does not manifest at surface appearances. Your take would be like pointing out an under-cover cop and saying, "look, he's in cahoots with the mob!!" Confronting the adversary head on would only lead to fracturing of the world into two opposed blocks. Within their block, the people behind WEF would be entrenched in their power. If you want to defeat and disenfranchise them once and for all, you need to get close to them and take control of their own mechanisms of rule over society. Please try to exercise your imagination a bit before you dismiss people as deluded. Do you understand that in order for Russia to credibly offer their Sputnik V vaccine to the world and preempt the WHO/GAVI/GATES monopoly, they HAD TO go along with WHO's agenda. Stating, as Belarus' Lukashenko did, that the agenda was bullshit would have instantly blown up their credibility.
No you're wrong. Suggest you have a look at what Riley Waggaman has to say about it. They are intrinsic part of the WHO You comment "like pointing out an under-cover cop and saying, "look, he's in cahoots with the mob!!" is indicative of a speculative comment. I didn't speculate at all. The president of South Africa is aboard BRICS and he for your information, is a scoundrel of the highest order and BTW is a member of WEF and a BMGF acolyte. You need to refresh your Geopolitics.
So as to your accusation that I should exercise my imagination, I return the favour as you are condescending like a Luongo.
Sunface - It is possible to be a member of WEF and not be onboard with all the world domination bit. In fact I would recommend joining to all who can in order to better understand what is in the works in order to avoid and possibly undermine it. That would be the most intelegent move.
I understand that there are many out there who talk about Putin, Xi, Modi, basically all the BRICS+ folks being secretly onboard with the whole great reset agenda but you really need to read and understand better what the whole RoW is doing and stop painting everyone with the brush of evil. There is plenty of real evil going on here.
I have and I suggest you look at it a little more carefully. I am not painting anyone with anything. I live in a BRICS country and Ramaphosa is a scoundrel. The ANC is a completely communist entity and infested with WEF acolytes.
The WEF is an evil organization and is a curse on society. It is unelected and is interfering in the free market system and dominating it.
Ah, now I understand. You don't know how the world works. You believe in freemarkets, democracy, capitalism... I challange you to give a real example of where any of those things are real and functioning as advertised.
The west has been running the show for a long time now but that is rapidly ending and the "grate reset" is just a despirate attempt to prolong it. It has no chance of happening in the RoW, aka the global south, BRICS+, or whatever. The west may fall under the thumb of the western elites plan and that will be hell but hell it already is becoming.
"All of the BRICS nations are firmly onboard the WEF’s Fourth Industrial Revolution and the UN’s Agenda 2030—notably its SDGs." Pos a seat at the table might have been a motive for them being with WEF ...pos aiming at improving relations, trade & friendship ...also, they all certainly get more power & control with Dig passports & Dig money......however, what precisely have they done re implementing WEF agendas? Secondly, this was all before Ukraine/sanctions/asset thefts..."back stabbing".
WEF is all about control of the public or people who will be the automated slaves of the Oligarchic Elite. Those heading the nations don't want to be the slaves but are quite happy to drive the system as long as they can benefit themselves. So they are quite prepared to sacrifice others as long as they are alright. They will sell their souls to the devil if need be.
The Oligarchs using the Clerisy who sit at the WEF and act on behalf of the Oligarchs. There are of course Oligarchs there at the WEF too, the Elite telling the clerisy what they want.
The clerisy is the intellectual elite (professional class), mainly the buffer layer of ‘experts’ and mediators like journalists and academics, who, in return for crumbs from the oligarchic tables, will provide the new aristocracy with ideological air-cover they need.
"what precisely have they done re implementing WEF agendas?" They are busy with that implementation right now, expropriating property, destroying economies by destroying energy sources and livelihoods of the middle class who will become the new slaves. Digitization of life is what they have to do to be able to control every aspect of the slaves life.
Those of course who don't want to be slaves who wish to be free sovereigns and also have not fallen for the latest injectable extermination plan are not happy like me, so we expose the evil. I am a believer in our creator we know as GOD. It is GOD to allows us to exist as human beings, and not some by evil psychopath or group of megalomaniacs who think they can play god.
"Secondly, this was all before Ukraine/sanctions/asset thefts" That is irrelevant, the wars are there to destroy people, its Malthusian and Eugenicist belief behind all WAR.
If you are happy with Marxism, then support the WEF.
Just a correction about France and Haiti. The USA definitely did not support Aristide, much less install him or back Haiti's claim of 21 billion$ in reparations. France conspired with USA and Canada to undermine Aristide and remove him from power. During Aristide's first term that began under Bush I, Clinton did all in his power to break the Lavalas movement that supported Aristide in Haiti and weaken Aristide. Under Bush II. the USA kidnapped President Aristide and dumped him in France's client state, the Central African Republic. I covered this in my book https://www.aupress.ca/books/120241-rocks-in-the-water-rocks-in-the-sun/.
When Aristide was deposed in 1991 he went into exile - to the US, from where he came to Haiti again and became president in 2000 with US help. His handler: CIA agent Luis Moreno. After Chirac and Domique de Villepin broke ranks with the Bush admin over Iraq invasion, Aristide raised the issue of restitution of Haiti's odious double debt to France in the amount of $21,685,135,571.48. For France, this was an H-bomb and within weeks they relented, and ultimately even joined NATO (they were not in NATO before that). Aristide played his role (did not raise any issue of restitution from the US who broke into Haiti's National Bank and simply carted off all of its gold in 1914, and who colonized Haiti from 1915 onwards). Only then the Americans deposed him again (2004), flew him out of Haiti on US-chartered plane. Unlike Ghaddafi, Saddam, Allende, Milosevic, Lumumba, Bhutto,... Aristide lived.
Aristide lived both in 1991 and 2004 because killing him would have set the Haitian people on fire. They loved Aristide and he truly believed himself to be their representative. (The USA thought their candidate would win the presidential elections both in 1990 and 2000. They miscalculated.) In 2004, Washington forced him to sign a letter of resignation and then whisked him out of the country. He was given a choice to either sign the letter and leave or watch his family be killed. Curiously, the UN Security Council never asked Aristide to explain what happened that night, while he was alive in the CAR. They just accepted the letter that the USA handed them as evidence that all was above board with his 'resignation' and so the interim government that they installed to replace him was legitimate. I wrote that this set an extraordinary precedent: anyone could overthrow a government and just show the UNSC a letter of resignation from the legitimate political leader, assured that the UNSC would never call on the deposed leader for comment. You write in the passive tense that, in 1991, Aristide "was deposed." But, in the active tense, he was deposed by the CIA and the death squads that it had unleashed from 1991 to 1994 to terrorize the Haitian poor who overwhelmingly supported Aristide. I'm sorry to see you erasing that violence against the poor from history. Washington, with the full cooperation of the Haitian families that claimed ownership of the country, wanted to destroy the Lavalas movement that had brought Aristide to power, fully against the will of Washington. (Even Jimmy Carter documented the violence that they were subject to.) Meanwhile, Aristide was kept in Washington where he was forced to negotiate with Clinton his return to the island. He was finally allowed back once he had agreed to the onerous terms set by Clinton. He was allowed to serve only a few more months of his five-year term, since Washington counted his years in Washington, during which the Army general that the USA had installed in his place oversaw the violent suppression of Aristide's supporters: the murders of all people influential in support of Lavalas and Aristide. When he returned, Aristide had enough time to disband the Haitian army, which had worked with the USA to try to destroy the will of the people. Aristide was never supported by the American government. But this is diving too deeply into the reality of the Empire's assault on Haiti for a comment section. My book is available online. It's very well footnoted. And it goes over 200 years of history.
I know what you can do to support your claim. Show me anywhere that the American government supported Aristide's claim for restitution from France. I can't recall ever seeing it in all my research. Of course, I wasn't looking because it was so obvious that Paris, Washington, and Ottawa were acting in concert to bring down Aristide. Moreover, France would never have agreed to pay restitution and Washington would never have supported the Haitian claim on France for the very practical reason that it would have opened the USA up to claims from all continents. Imagine what America owed Vietnam, the DRC, and so on ad infinitum.
It's disturbing to see Vanessa "like" an analysis that wipes out a poor, extraordinarily-oppressed people by means of invented, bias-confirming facts. Meanwhile, she ignores my analysis based on extensive, well-documented research, including a year of living with the Haitian poor, the victims of these atrocities.
You are each a bright light in this dark tunnel time. Thank you.
Brilliant interview. Optimistic? not yet....they never run out of tricks & the public are still mind controlled by "education" & "The narrative" & other. The internet is or has been the greatest revolution ever, we can now hear views/facts from extremely knowledgeable & expert folks all over the world instantly. This can also expose Official & Corporate lies, fraud, misinformation etc forcing wrongdoers to change their tactics. But they always do,...they just sweep one massively profitable war failure/racket under the rug & start another war/scam/distraction. They know internet exposing rackets is a death blow to them so now increasingly in recent years they are greatly ramping up internet censorship using armies of massively funded Govt & corporate"misinformation police". Currently in USA they are trying to introduce fines (up to $1 Mil) & Gaol (up to 20yrs) for folks communicating "misinformation" or "Harmful" info. In my view most people in the west are still constantly hoodwinked by media lies & "comfortable" so the ancient trick of "Bread & Circuses" still works like a charm. Other tools they constantly use are fear, distraction and division. Yes Alex, they are still extremely dangerous & more & more vulnerable....AND they could still push us into a hot war with Russia ….& where that will lead too….& you can bet the house, if that would cause the deaths of 4 Billion people they would not care in the slightest. Or anymore than they did for the pos 2 Mill deaths caused in Iraq & ….. It's a battle for hearts & minds, VB & Alex you are doing great, great work, thankyou! …We all need to try & keep spreading knowledge & discussion as much as pos ...word of mouth & sharing info is great (& they hate it!), just do it & keep doing it everybody, it works!
"BRICS and the emergence of a better world order that values the sovereignty of nations." No, so sorry, he is deluded and so are those that believe that.
All of the BRICS nations are firmly onboard the WEF’s Fourth Industrial Revolution and the UN’s Agenda 2030—notably its SDGs.
Please note this case in point.
China and Germany have secured a three-year joint action plan aimed at strengthening international development cooperation to effectively implement the United Nations' 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. - https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202306/21/WS64923391a310bf8a75d6afe0.html
You're wrong Jack; the real struggle does not manifest at surface appearances. Your take would be like pointing out an under-cover cop and saying, "look, he's in cahoots with the mob!!" Confronting the adversary head on would only lead to fracturing of the world into two opposed blocks. Within their block, the people behind WEF would be entrenched in their power. If you want to defeat and disenfranchise them once and for all, you need to get close to them and take control of their own mechanisms of rule over society. Please try to exercise your imagination a bit before you dismiss people as deluded. Do you understand that in order for Russia to credibly offer their Sputnik V vaccine to the world and preempt the WHO/GAVI/GATES monopoly, they HAD TO go along with WHO's agenda. Stating, as Belarus' Lukashenko did, that the agenda was bullshit would have instantly blown up their credibility.
No you're wrong. Suggest you have a look at what Riley Waggaman has to say about it. They are intrinsic part of the WHO You comment "like pointing out an under-cover cop and saying, "look, he's in cahoots with the mob!!" is indicative of a speculative comment. I didn't speculate at all. The president of South Africa is aboard BRICS and he for your information, is a scoundrel of the highest order and BTW is a member of WEF and a BMGF acolyte. You need to refresh your Geopolitics.
So as to your accusation that I should exercise my imagination, I return the favour as you are condescending like a Luongo.
https://edwardslavsquat.substack.com/p/its-time-for-an-alt-media-reset
Mate, you were first out with the "deluded" disqualification and now you're complaining because I invited you to use your imagination? Whatever.
Not your mate for sure. Get over it.
Sunface - It is possible to be a member of WEF and not be onboard with all the world domination bit. In fact I would recommend joining to all who can in order to better understand what is in the works in order to avoid and possibly undermine it. That would be the most intelegent move.
I understand that there are many out there who talk about Putin, Xi, Modi, basically all the BRICS+ folks being secretly onboard with the whole great reset agenda but you really need to read and understand better what the whole RoW is doing and stop painting everyone with the brush of evil. There is plenty of real evil going on here.
I have and I suggest you look at it a little more carefully. I am not painting anyone with anything. I live in a BRICS country and Ramaphosa is a scoundrel. The ANC is a completely communist entity and infested with WEF acolytes.
The WEF is an evil organization and is a curse on society. It is unelected and is interfering in the free market system and dominating it.
Here is some more for you to chew on. https://edwardslavsquat.substack.com/p/russia-is-still-complicit-in-the
Ah, now I understand. You don't know how the world works. You believe in freemarkets, democracy, capitalism... I challange you to give a real example of where any of those things are real and functioning as advertised.
The west has been running the show for a long time now but that is rapidly ending and the "grate reset" is just a despirate attempt to prolong it. It has no chance of happening in the RoW, aka the global south, BRICS+, or whatever. The west may fall under the thumb of the western elites plan and that will be hell but hell it already is becoming.
Cheers Mate
Your hallucinating again. or is it withdrawal symptom? I mentioned democracy belief where exactly?
PS. I am not your Mate
"All of the BRICS nations are firmly onboard the WEF’s Fourth Industrial Revolution and the UN’s Agenda 2030—notably its SDGs." Pos a seat at the table might have been a motive for them being with WEF ...pos aiming at improving relations, trade & friendship ...also, they all certainly get more power & control with Dig passports & Dig money......however, what precisely have they done re implementing WEF agendas? Secondly, this was all before Ukraine/sanctions/asset thefts..."back stabbing".
WEF is all about control of the public or people who will be the automated slaves of the Oligarchic Elite. Those heading the nations don't want to be the slaves but are quite happy to drive the system as long as they can benefit themselves. So they are quite prepared to sacrifice others as long as they are alright. They will sell their souls to the devil if need be.
The Oligarchs using the Clerisy who sit at the WEF and act on behalf of the Oligarchs. There are of course Oligarchs there at the WEF too, the Elite telling the clerisy what they want.
The clerisy is the intellectual elite (professional class), mainly the buffer layer of ‘experts’ and mediators like journalists and academics, who, in return for crumbs from the oligarchic tables, will provide the new aristocracy with ideological air-cover they need.
"what precisely have they done re implementing WEF agendas?" They are busy with that implementation right now, expropriating property, destroying economies by destroying energy sources and livelihoods of the middle class who will become the new slaves. Digitization of life is what they have to do to be able to control every aspect of the slaves life.
Those of course who don't want to be slaves who wish to be free sovereigns and also have not fallen for the latest injectable extermination plan are not happy like me, so we expose the evil. I am a believer in our creator we know as GOD. It is GOD to allows us to exist as human beings, and not some by evil psychopath or group of megalomaniacs who think they can play god.
"Secondly, this was all before Ukraine/sanctions/asset thefts" That is irrelevant, the wars are there to destroy people, its Malthusian and Eugenicist belief behind all WAR.
If you are happy with Marxism, then support the WEF.
Thank you for this outstanding interview, Vanessa! You and Alex Krainer both offer such valuable insights.
Just a correction about France and Haiti. The USA definitely did not support Aristide, much less install him or back Haiti's claim of 21 billion$ in reparations. France conspired with USA and Canada to undermine Aristide and remove him from power. During Aristide's first term that began under Bush I, Clinton did all in his power to break the Lavalas movement that supported Aristide in Haiti and weaken Aristide. Under Bush II. the USA kidnapped President Aristide and dumped him in France's client state, the Central African Republic. I covered this in my book https://www.aupress.ca/books/120241-rocks-in-the-water-rocks-in-the-sun/.
When Aristide was deposed in 1991 he went into exile - to the US, from where he came to Haiti again and became president in 2000 with US help. His handler: CIA agent Luis Moreno. After Chirac and Domique de Villepin broke ranks with the Bush admin over Iraq invasion, Aristide raised the issue of restitution of Haiti's odious double debt to France in the amount of $21,685,135,571.48. For France, this was an H-bomb and within weeks they relented, and ultimately even joined NATO (they were not in NATO before that). Aristide played his role (did not raise any issue of restitution from the US who broke into Haiti's National Bank and simply carted off all of its gold in 1914, and who colonized Haiti from 1915 onwards). Only then the Americans deposed him again (2004), flew him out of Haiti on US-chartered plane. Unlike Ghaddafi, Saddam, Allende, Milosevic, Lumumba, Bhutto,... Aristide lived.
Aristide lived both in 1991 and 2004 because killing him would have set the Haitian people on fire. They loved Aristide and he truly believed himself to be their representative. (The USA thought their candidate would win the presidential elections both in 1990 and 2000. They miscalculated.) In 2004, Washington forced him to sign a letter of resignation and then whisked him out of the country. He was given a choice to either sign the letter and leave or watch his family be killed. Curiously, the UN Security Council never asked Aristide to explain what happened that night, while he was alive in the CAR. They just accepted the letter that the USA handed them as evidence that all was above board with his 'resignation' and so the interim government that they installed to replace him was legitimate. I wrote that this set an extraordinary precedent: anyone could overthrow a government and just show the UNSC a letter of resignation from the legitimate political leader, assured that the UNSC would never call on the deposed leader for comment. You write in the passive tense that, in 1991, Aristide "was deposed." But, in the active tense, he was deposed by the CIA and the death squads that it had unleashed from 1991 to 1994 to terrorize the Haitian poor who overwhelmingly supported Aristide. I'm sorry to see you erasing that violence against the poor from history. Washington, with the full cooperation of the Haitian families that claimed ownership of the country, wanted to destroy the Lavalas movement that had brought Aristide to power, fully against the will of Washington. (Even Jimmy Carter documented the violence that they were subject to.) Meanwhile, Aristide was kept in Washington where he was forced to negotiate with Clinton his return to the island. He was finally allowed back once he had agreed to the onerous terms set by Clinton. He was allowed to serve only a few more months of his five-year term, since Washington counted his years in Washington, during which the Army general that the USA had installed in his place oversaw the violent suppression of Aristide's supporters: the murders of all people influential in support of Lavalas and Aristide. When he returned, Aristide had enough time to disband the Haitian army, which had worked with the USA to try to destroy the will of the people. Aristide was never supported by the American government. But this is diving too deeply into the reality of the Empire's assault on Haiti for a comment section. My book is available online. It's very well footnoted. And it goes over 200 years of history.
Also, you could look at this post I published that deals with the second Aristide presidency and the collusion of France, the USA, and Canada to bring down Aristide and Lavalas: https://heartofhaiti.wordpress.com/2016/03/15/guy-taillefer-and-le-devoir/
I know what you can do to support your claim. Show me anywhere that the American government supported Aristide's claim for restitution from France. I can't recall ever seeing it in all my research. Of course, I wasn't looking because it was so obvious that Paris, Washington, and Ottawa were acting in concert to bring down Aristide. Moreover, France would never have agreed to pay restitution and Washington would never have supported the Haitian claim on France for the very practical reason that it would have opened the USA up to claims from all continents. Imagine what America owed Vietnam, the DRC, and so on ad infinitum.
It's disturbing to see Vanessa "like" an analysis that wipes out a poor, extraordinarily-oppressed people by means of invented, bias-confirming facts. Meanwhile, she ignores my analysis based on extensive, well-documented research, including a year of living with the Haitian poor, the victims of these atrocities.